How am I doing?
About as well as can be expected I suppose. Looking back over my blog efforts doesn't show an individual inspired by much really.
I have, however, made a huge decision. Actually making a decision is a big thing in my life. It takes a long time, a lot of procrastination, lots of 'maybes' and 'perhaps' and 'but what ifs.' Often I do see the rainbow but I'm also prone to see the dark black clouds gathering and I just know that they're going to block out that rainbow. They rarely do but then again they just might.
That decision was to give up my 'Junk Mail' rounds. I had already given up one of them which left me with three. They take about one hour and thirty minutes each to walk and about the same to fold. While the income is of help, my wife and kids have prevailed and I do my last round at the end of this month.
What am going to do with all that extra time I will have on my hands?
Well I am in training to do what I promised myself I would do in my retirement years.
I will resume my writing, and working on my jade carving and jewellery making. I will also be able to devote more time to my Church life. Since making the big decision I have put myself entirely in the Lord's hands. That decision was made at 0740 hours on Wednesday 12th September. There was no spontaneous sound of hallelujahs but there was a comfortable feel about making it, writing it down in my diary, and saying it aloud. Since that day life has not changed a lot but in myself I feel calmer. Normally I would be approaching the end of October with dread, wondering how we will survive, along with a lot of other matters.
I'm looking forward to November. I'm looking forward to goodness knows what. At least I am looking forward.
Mm, none of that is what I originally set out to blog about, but there you are.
Sunday, 21 October 2018
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
Christians and Pharisees
I spend a greater part of my musing wondering about those who call themselves Christians. Mostly I do this whilst I am wandering the streets of Masterton putting advertising pamphlets into those letter boxes that don't have large 'No Junk Mail' signs on them. I undertake the deliveries to supplement my superannuation. The remuneration is pretty minimal. Also, out of that minimal payment, I am required to pay income tax and also Accident Compensation Corporation dues. I stick with the belief that at least the 4 to 5 hours of walking is doing something towards my health. I counteract that goodness with lots of chocolate.
However I am getting off the subject.
I belong to a congregation that is known as a joint or uniting congregation that goes back to the days when various denominations decided that the future lay in union, rather than alone, as we all worshipped the same God. As a result the local Presbyterian congregation and the local Methodist congregation combined under the the one umbrella. Time went along, as it does, and there was the inevitable 're-think' and the mother churches decided that union was not for them so they appeared to abandon those 'joint' congregations and concentrated on more lucrative congregations.
What they did not abandon, of course, were the buildings. After all, those structures were worth 'a bob or two.'
As a result many joint congregations were left with two masters to deal with. In many cases those masters pulled in opposite directions but always required their share of the money the congregations raised.
Life went on until it didn't in many cases. The congregations became older and both the congregations and the masters lost touch with their roots and their purpose. Sunday congregations dropped to a few elderly people gathering for four hymns, two prayers and a sermon that rarely related to current events.
So, in the case of the congregation I belong to, it was decided to merge with another nearby congregation. One congregation was a Union congregation and the other Presbyterian. Both congregations were made up primarily of people who had at various times been members of both congregations. Agreement was 'sort of' reached with one of the big sticking points being the buildings. The union congregation building had some local historical significance and following the Canterbury earthquake had under gone strengthening to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars raised via many means. Financially the Union congregation was in a reasonable state. The Presbyterian congregation, not so much. Following a lot of discussion and numerous meetings agreement was reached on a merger. The use of the buildings was not settled but agreement was reached that one Minister would be shared between both congregations, in the interim, and the use of the buildings be decided later.
All were reasonably happy.
Along comes the biggest property owner of the two buildings, the Presbyterian Church. New trustees, or something, said that the merger had not been in accordance with the 'rules' and would have to be done all over again. As a result there has been a big split between the congregants. It is primarily over the buildings and at which place services should take place etc, etc.
Now I come to my point of Christians and Christianity.
Surely it is irrelevant where the services take place. This holding onto buildings is, in my mind, so wrong. In one of the cases the building complex spends the best part of six days empty. In the other case the complex houses a Childcare facility and an opportunity shop. One complex is on the main street and the other is close to the local hospital. Surely the complex near the hospital could be used to house those relatives who were visiting the sick and injured. Maybe it could be used by the homeless or those in need of temporary housing.
Surely that would be a Christian response. Let's face it, Christians follow the way of Jesus and all I see here is groups of those I call Pharisees. What did Jesus call them? Snakes and vipers wasn't it?
How very, very sad!
However I am getting off the subject.
I belong to a congregation that is known as a joint or uniting congregation that goes back to the days when various denominations decided that the future lay in union, rather than alone, as we all worshipped the same God. As a result the local Presbyterian congregation and the local Methodist congregation combined under the the one umbrella. Time went along, as it does, and there was the inevitable 're-think' and the mother churches decided that union was not for them so they appeared to abandon those 'joint' congregations and concentrated on more lucrative congregations.
What they did not abandon, of course, were the buildings. After all, those structures were worth 'a bob or two.'
As a result many joint congregations were left with two masters to deal with. In many cases those masters pulled in opposite directions but always required their share of the money the congregations raised.
Life went on until it didn't in many cases. The congregations became older and both the congregations and the masters lost touch with their roots and their purpose. Sunday congregations dropped to a few elderly people gathering for four hymns, two prayers and a sermon that rarely related to current events.
So, in the case of the congregation I belong to, it was decided to merge with another nearby congregation. One congregation was a Union congregation and the other Presbyterian. Both congregations were made up primarily of people who had at various times been members of both congregations. Agreement was 'sort of' reached with one of the big sticking points being the buildings. The union congregation building had some local historical significance and following the Canterbury earthquake had under gone strengthening to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars raised via many means. Financially the Union congregation was in a reasonable state. The Presbyterian congregation, not so much. Following a lot of discussion and numerous meetings agreement was reached on a merger. The use of the buildings was not settled but agreement was reached that one Minister would be shared between both congregations, in the interim, and the use of the buildings be decided later.
All were reasonably happy.
Along comes the biggest property owner of the two buildings, the Presbyterian Church. New trustees, or something, said that the merger had not been in accordance with the 'rules' and would have to be done all over again. As a result there has been a big split between the congregants. It is primarily over the buildings and at which place services should take place etc, etc.
Now I come to my point of Christians and Christianity.
Surely it is irrelevant where the services take place. This holding onto buildings is, in my mind, so wrong. In one of the cases the building complex spends the best part of six days empty. In the other case the complex houses a Childcare facility and an opportunity shop. One complex is on the main street and the other is close to the local hospital. Surely the complex near the hospital could be used to house those relatives who were visiting the sick and injured. Maybe it could be used by the homeless or those in need of temporary housing.
Surely that would be a Christian response. Let's face it, Christians follow the way of Jesus and all I see here is groups of those I call Pharisees. What did Jesus call them? Snakes and vipers wasn't it?
How very, very sad!
Monday, 14 December 2015
3 Little Churches
Once upon a time there was a town with three
churches.
One was made of straw, one was made of sticks and one was made of
bricks.
The straw church had a lot of people attending it.
It was a pretty basic building but looked nice from the outside. The people
liked it because it those in charge said that everything was good and all you
had to do was come to it on a Sunday and God would look after you. The leaders
made rules and regulations and held meetings together but pretty much left people
to their own devices. From time to time wind blew through the straw, the
building rocked but because it didn’t fall down nobody worried too much.
The stick church was neither flash nor ugly. It
just was. It appeared nice and solid. The people in it worked hard for God.
Whenever a draft appeared they would cover over the hole with whatever was at
hand. The leaders worked hard and were good people but their time ended up
being spent on stopping the drafts. In the end the building became the
important object. God was important but Sunday took care of that.
The brick Church was an important church. A lot of
people attended it because it was important. The leaders made sure that
everything looked really nice and that everything ran smoothly. If problems arose,
nobody knew about them as they were dealt with behind the scenes by a few
people ‘in the know.’ This church was a proud church with proud arrogant
people. They knew God’s word, according to them, and theirs was the right way.
One day, a group of people from all three churches
met accidently. I think it was at Food for Thought or the Ten O’Clock Cookie
Company but may have been Strada or The Village Grinder. The hot choccy,
coffee, tea and scones went to their heads and they felt something like a wind
race around them. Some said that they even saw flames in the air. Others saw
and heard nothing but felt something in their hearts. They suddenly realised
that their straw church was slowly falling over, that the drafts in the stick
church were letting in a cold wind that was turning people away and that the
brick church had become drab and sad. They realised that very few people now
went to their churches. Oh, there were the old die-hards holding on to their
pet beliefs but they were getting to the stage where they were alone. Some had
tried new programs which burnt for a while but then flickered and went out.
They wondered what they could do. They had tried to work together but nothing
had come of it. They still stayed the same three little churches.
Then a quiet newcomer to the group who had been
sitting at an adjacent table spoke up.
“Why do you go to your Churches?” she asked.
“Because we are Christians,” was the reply. “We
praise God and do God’s work. We make Christ Visible in the Community.”
“I don’t see him,” she said and got up and left.
Wednesday, 26 November 2014
Sense of Despair
Part of my Australian family have just returned to Perth. Cost prevented the entire family returning for a visit so my daughter, son-in-law, one granddaughter and one grandson arrived. Our daughter has not returned to her country of birth for fourteen years. Some of you reading this will understand how wonderful it was to have her back in New Zealand.
It is not fourteen years since we have seen her, as we have been funded to Perth by her three times over the years. Having her home is something different though.
On at least two occasions my daughter has been included in a dream that occurs to me from time to time relating to our children. Both dreams take place sometime after I have died, and I am watching them during their lives following my death. A great sense of loss, sorrow and almost overwhelming despair settles over me. My family are continuing with their lives, as you do, and my despair is not that they are shattered and unable to cope without me, but that I have lost them.
While my daughter was here on this occasion, she was perusing the plaques attached to the inside walls of St Luke's, the church I attend. One of them was remembering the presentation of a Union Jack flag to the church by the Senior Armed Forces Padre at the time. It was the Padre who had conducted my daughter's marriage ceremony. In my dream, this last time, I could see my daughter holding a photograph of the plaque and remembering its association with this recent visit. The sense of lost and sorrow was incredible; not my daughter's sorrow, mine.
Interesting.
Has anyone else experienced anything similar?
It is not fourteen years since we have seen her, as we have been funded to Perth by her three times over the years. Having her home is something different though.
On at least two occasions my daughter has been included in a dream that occurs to me from time to time relating to our children. Both dreams take place sometime after I have died, and I am watching them during their lives following my death. A great sense of loss, sorrow and almost overwhelming despair settles over me. My family are continuing with their lives, as you do, and my despair is not that they are shattered and unable to cope without me, but that I have lost them.
While my daughter was here on this occasion, she was perusing the plaques attached to the inside walls of St Luke's, the church I attend. One of them was remembering the presentation of a Union Jack flag to the church by the Senior Armed Forces Padre at the time. It was the Padre who had conducted my daughter's marriage ceremony. In my dream, this last time, I could see my daughter holding a photograph of the plaque and remembering its association with this recent visit. The sense of lost and sorrow was incredible; not my daughter's sorrow, mine.
Interesting.
Has anyone else experienced anything similar?
Monday, 18 August 2014
Why David?
Whilst growing up I attended Sunday school. Mostly it was on a part time basis as we lived on a farm in the country and there was an inability to get to town for church and Sunday school after milking. The only real impression I had of King David of the bible was the killing of Goliath. That impression was solely that one act. I did not relate King David to the son of Jesse. (At that time I did not know who Jesse was either.)
When I got a bit older, and was drifting away from Christianity, I occasionally read the bible in some forlorn hope that if I did so then God would help me pass some exams that I was required to sit. I failed. I did read about David and Bathsheba however.
Many moons later I came back to Christianity and I have now read the bible through several times. Now, of course, I can put two and two together. I 'get' the messages and know that David wrote some of the psalms and that Solomon was his son.
The initial thing that grabbed my attention, however, related to David's actions when he lead his 600 men in pursuit of the Amalekites after they had attacked Ziklag and carried away all the women and children. (1 Samuel 30:1-25.) David and his men chased after the Amalekites. They were weary, tired and dispirited and when they reached the brook of Besor, some of the 600 stayed there. They were too exhausted to go on. 200 of them stayed there while David and 400 went on. To cut a long story short, David caught up with the raiders, and freed his wives, his soldiers families and all the animals and goods taken by the Amalekites.
When David, his men, and the freed families arrived back at Brook Besor some of the 400 who had gone on with David, objected to sharing the 'spoils' with those who had stayed at the brook, too exhausted to go on. David then said, "My brothers, you can't do this with what the Lord has given us! He kept us safe and gave us victory over the raiders. No one can agree with what you say! All must share alike: whoever stays behind with the supplies gets the same share as the one who goes into battle."
I have shared this at several services in 'Old Folks Homes' as generally they also are too exhausted to go on. They have fought the battle but they also will reap the rewards. Actually they still do fight the good fight in many ways. They pray. Those who pray are generally at the forefront of the Spiritual war.
However, to a degree, I digress.
As I age, as time goes by, I find I am drawn back to King David. His life is our life. He had our failings and we can have his triumphs. He points me towards my Lord.
After years of unbelievers asserting that there was no historical record of King David I smile to myself at the evidence now coming to hand proving his existence. Not that I ever doubted.
New Zealanders will be interested in the fact that our soldiers were at Brook Besor during WW2.
When I got a bit older, and was drifting away from Christianity, I occasionally read the bible in some forlorn hope that if I did so then God would help me pass some exams that I was required to sit. I failed. I did read about David and Bathsheba however.
Many moons later I came back to Christianity and I have now read the bible through several times. Now, of course, I can put two and two together. I 'get' the messages and know that David wrote some of the psalms and that Solomon was his son.
The initial thing that grabbed my attention, however, related to David's actions when he lead his 600 men in pursuit of the Amalekites after they had attacked Ziklag and carried away all the women and children. (1 Samuel 30:1-25.) David and his men chased after the Amalekites. They were weary, tired and dispirited and when they reached the brook of Besor, some of the 600 stayed there. They were too exhausted to go on. 200 of them stayed there while David and 400 went on. To cut a long story short, David caught up with the raiders, and freed his wives, his soldiers families and all the animals and goods taken by the Amalekites.
When David, his men, and the freed families arrived back at Brook Besor some of the 400 who had gone on with David, objected to sharing the 'spoils' with those who had stayed at the brook, too exhausted to go on. David then said, "My brothers, you can't do this with what the Lord has given us! He kept us safe and gave us victory over the raiders. No one can agree with what you say! All must share alike: whoever stays behind with the supplies gets the same share as the one who goes into battle."
I have shared this at several services in 'Old Folks Homes' as generally they also are too exhausted to go on. They have fought the battle but they also will reap the rewards. Actually they still do fight the good fight in many ways. They pray. Those who pray are generally at the forefront of the Spiritual war.
However, to a degree, I digress.
As I age, as time goes by, I find I am drawn back to King David. His life is our life. He had our failings and we can have his triumphs. He points me towards my Lord.
After years of unbelievers asserting that there was no historical record of King David I smile to myself at the evidence now coming to hand proving his existence. Not that I ever doubted.
New Zealanders will be interested in the fact that our soldiers were at Brook Besor during WW2.
Monday, 23 September 2013
Wow, Maybe Thirty Christians
The building is magnificent. It is old, not fully earthquake
proof according to today's current standards, brick and mortar and has been a
worship centre for years and years. I counted the worshippers on Sunday last: thirty and that
was stretching it a tad. How does a congregation of thirty support a projected
budget with a deficit of several thousand dollars?
We have been in negotiations with a sister congregation, and
while they were enthusiastic, and committed that enthusiasm to paper, it has waned
a bit lately. I put a fair bit of it down to a combination of age, an
unenthusiastic faith, and primarily, I think, to a lack of vision.
The median age would have to be in the late sixties. There
is a great scarcity of children. Well there would be with that median age
wouldn't there. Grand children? Saw a couple once.
So why persist?
Well a few can see that unless something is done, then 150
years of Christ in the main street will disappear. Perhaps that is what needs
to happen. After all, thirty people hardly trumpet God's message.
I am told that in any mainline church congregation today
about 75% of the congregation will be attending out of habit, because they
enjoy meeting friends or that is their one social outing. Belief has little to
do with attendance. Okay, there is one problem. Actually there is the whole
problem.
Today the mainline churches, and unfortunately it is
creeping into the Pentecostal and other movements as well, have become largely
social agencies. As such they do a great job for the Community, in which they
exist, and the Government. Need food? Go and see the local Church or the local
Foodbank run by the church. Need clothes? Need furniture? Go to the local
church Op shop. Kids need looking after before and after school while you work?
The local Government funded after-school and pre-school care centres are
probably run by a Church.
Yeah, Churches are great places to hang out, and there is
the problem. There is nothing wrong with what the churches are doing as far as
helping their neighbours is concerned. They are being 'Good Samaritans.' They love
their neighbours. They are doing all the things Christians should do: but they
are not doing it for God. They provide for the needy, but the accolades or
acknowledgement goes to those doing the work, or the churches hosting the
service. It should be going to God. It should be done for God's glory, not for
the church's glory. It should also be done free. Being paid to do God's work
rankles with me. Being a Minister or Pastor today is a career, not a calling.
Tax returns are altered. Tax avoidance is practiced. Ministers are paid by
Funeral Directors and by those getting married for conducting the relevant services.
A majority of the Ministers I have known, accept that payment as a tax free
payment and put it straight into their pockets as a 'perk.' I am not advocating
that those preaching God's word should rely on gifts, I accept that these days a
salary or similar is correct. It's the way that Church administration now
consists of numerous management layers, all of whom have their nose in the
Church trough that irks me. They are not doing that for the Glory of God. They
are doing for the glory of their own pockets and lifestyles.
However, enough of my soapbox rant.
What to do about the thirty people grouped each Sunday in
the lovely old heritage rated church building. $500,000 plus to bring it up to
safety standards. Knock it down would be the best idea. Great, let's do that.
Wait though. Before it can be knocked down there is the Council requirement
for an engineers report. Only $10,000. We can handle that: with help. The
Council will probably say the significance of the building is such that it
cannot be demolished. They will also say it cannot be used. What happens? We
put up a fence round it and walk away.
Sounds good to me. That will also let us 'do our own thing'
in a more suitable building. But what about the fact that God will disappear
from the town's main street? I don't think he is there now. There is just a
building catering for probably 10 to 15 of God's people in a largely secular
community.
Can God stay on the Main Street do you think? My answer?
Yes, but only with prayer and giving God his due.
Thursday, 11 July 2013
Christianity is for Sale
My wife and I live on the New Zealand Superannuation. It is
enough for us to survive on, and have the occasional cup of hot chocolate at a
cafe.
From time to time, I have attended Church Home Groups, or
Small groups, for bible study, or study to advance my theological knowledge
etc. Without fail the studies have used a booklet, often called a study guide,
written by some one with personal, or deduced knowledge, relating to the subject.
Because of copyright restrictions, the study guides and personal study books
cannot be photocopied, so each participant must purchase a booklet. Okay, so an
average cost seems to be $8 - $10 each. Average small groups vary from six to twenty
people. The publisher gets $60 to $200 per group.
Likewise, if you wish to catch up on what your favourite
Pastor is writing, then you could be paying anything up to $50 per book. Have
you checked out the price of a bible lately?
I can actually remember saying to my wife, prior to
publishing anything, that I would write Christian literature because there was
a captive market and I could make a fortune. Well that didn't go too well. I
could not afford to pay an editor, cover person or spend time searching for a
publisher or agent. I went for Smashwords because at the time they were the
only people who could take my MS Word document and turn it into an EBook free.
I published Ripples, a book of stories with a Christian and
moral theme for children, and Pastors, and a novel: The Begat Legacy. Some
copies of Ripples were purchased, mainly, I suspect, by family, although they
deny it. At $0.99c, I thought the price was reasonable. The Begat Legacy, an 800,000-word
novel, aimed at the secular market, I priced at $2.99c. A few copies sold but
not many.
I got to thinking! Checking out Smashwords and Amazon free
EBooks, I found that there are not many Christian Books available. There are a large
number of pornographic and general available however. During 'Read an EBook week',
I priced Ripples free and The Begat Legacy for $1.99. There were downloads of a
couple of copies of Ripples but none for 'Begat'.
I then made both available free. There have been many
downloads since then.
So what do I make of all this? From now on, I will make all
my Christian EBooks available free. I do not class 'Begat' in that category as
it is targeted at people who would not pick up an overtly Christian book. It is R18 and designed to open some minds to the fact that there is such a thing as
Christianity. If only one person picks up a bible to check what I have written,
I will be satisfied with it.
The big question left is; Why do Christian writers,
particularly of study guides, apologetics and doctrine, put their books
financially out of the reach of so many? They publish to a captive market, a
market eager to purchase books that they can be assured are suitable for their
tastes and beliefs. If we are to reach and teach, then should we not be
publishing free? Did not Paul work for a living while he served?
Mm, interesting!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)